![]() |
| About the Association . Common Questions . Clinic . Interventions . Topology . School . Connections |
Contact address: TEL: 323-913-1650 |
From On Knots To One Knot Constructing P.G.Tait’s On Knots Otherwise By Robert Groome This text is a pre-print publication of an introduction soon to be released in print form. It was written and constructed by R. Groome, while M.Phillips, H.R. Harrison, and M.E. Powell helped to refine the English language and argument. It is printed here as a work in the context of the School/Clinic of Psychoanalysis Los Angeles California Extension (P.L.A.C.E.) and as a preparation for its 2009-2010 conferences on knot theory and psychoanalysis (see Interface) From Kelvin's 'On Vortex Motion' [1867] I:Preliminaries We will begin with a quick trip through the scientific history as a way to introduce On Knots within the themes and successions that it is habitually associated with. Once this has been established, we will proceed to a more structural interpretation that aims to disengage the theory of knots from such a natural history and themes, while extending it to a psychoanalytic theory of One Knot. (continued) [download pdf] The Work of Pierre Soury: On Cartels and
Speech Click here for complete article The Topological Dénouement of the Cure
Historical Background If Jacques Lacan had been interrogating the limits of Freudian psychoanalysis from the beginning, it was not until 1956 with D'une question préliminaire a' tout traitement possible de la psychose ( Of A Preliminary Question To Any Possible Treatment of Psychosis) that he showed the necessity of reformulating the problem in a topological presentation that went beyond an "abstract theory of the faculties of the subject"1. Although Lacan continued to purify what he called the "ideology of psychoanalysis" through a topology of surfaces, it was not until February 9th 1972, in his seminar Ou Pire, that he changes to a theory of knots and announces his discovery of the Borromean Rings. What remains invariant in this transformation is the insistence that the use of such topological structures consists not in illustrating the theory of psychoanalysis, but of initiating a practice of psychoanalysis itself: For is not structuralism what permits us to pose our experience as the field where it speaks? If yes, "the distance to experience" of structure disappears since it [the structure] operates not as a theoretical model, but as the original machine which puts in scene the subject. (Remarques Sur La Rapport De Daniel Lagache, Lacan, 1958-60) By the time of R.S.I., Lacan corresponds the three closed chords of the Borromean Lock to the Real, Symbolic, and the Imaginary, while noting this tertiary grouping of rings was only a minimum and required a fourth ring that was only implicitly indicated in Freud's use of the term psychic reality. Further still, by explicitly equating this fourth ring with the Nom-du-Pere and the Oedipus complex Lacan isolates it as what analysis comes to operate on: "To be knotted otherwise, this is what is essential to the Oedipus Complex and it is precisely on what analysis operates." (R.S.I., January 14th 1975) Dénouement of the Sinthome A Space Of Which One Has No Idea
|
PLACE - 1223 Wilshire Boulevard, #1514 - Santa Monica, CA 90403-5400PLACE@topoi.net - TEL:Tel:323-913-1650
|